Disk partition sizes
notes at isucs1.UUCP
notes at isucs1.UUCP
Sun Mar 17 17:01:21 AEST 1985
A question on file system sizes. Our Vax 730 running BSD4.2 is
partitioned using the information out of the /etc/disktab file. We have an rb80
disk drive partitioned as folows:
/dev/rb1a sec used 15884 sec avail 16058 cyl 0 - 36
/dev/rb1b sec used 33440 sec avail 33852 cyl 37 - 114
/dev/rb1g sec used 82080 sec avail 82460 cyl 115 - 304
/dev/rb1h sec used 110143 sec avail 110236 cyl 305 - 558
When I run diskpart 8 it recommends the following differences:
/dev/rb1d 15884 sec cylinders 115 - 151
/dev/rb1e 55936 sec cylinders 152 - 280
/dev/rb1f 120466 sec cylinders 281 - 558
/dev/rb1g 192510 sec cylinders 115 - 558
/dev/rb1h unused
We would like to partition our disk with the g partition described
in the second list. This would give us the standard a & b partitions with
the remainder of the disk in partition g. Has any body ever done this and
does it work?
My second question is why does diskpart 8 only recomend 192510 sectors
when there are 192539 sectors available according to the way the diskpart manual
page describes how to compute it. Compute as follows: (192696 the total
possible number of sectors ) - (1 track,31 sectors on an rb80; for the
replicated copies of the bad144 table) - (126 sectors to which bad sectors can
be mapped)= 192539. Where do the numbers that diskpart 8 is recommending come
from and why wouldn't I be able to use the number calculated above. Also if
these calculations are correct our h partition configured the berkeley way is
stomping on the bad144 info as it only leaves 94 sectors at the end of the disk
rather then the recommended 157 sectors.
-Jeff Rule
UUCP: {umn-cs,csu-cs,okstate}!isucs1!exnet
[Beat em or burn em they all go up pretty easy.] - 'Night of the Living Dead'
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list