Why DEC doesn't need an ABI
Amos Shapir
amos at taux01.UUCP
Mon Jun 27 15:07:38 AEST 1988
VAX is the only successful architecture that has no clones. Tahoe (CCI
Power 6/32) is a close imitation, but certain changes were made to make
sure it was *not* compatible with a VAX - if you have a Tahoe to hack
on, look at the opcodes - they are mostly the VAX's opcodes, with the
hex digits reversed!
I participated in the original design team of the Tahoe; if there was an
ABI for the VAX at the time (1982) CCI would probably use it. But DEC's
attitude made it clear that they intend to make money selling iron, and
would not favor cloning - the old 'software is what makes the hardware
work' approach. (Rather than the other way round, which is more common
nowadays).
--
Amos Shapir (My other cpu is a NS32532)
National Semiconductor (Israel)
6 Maskit st. P.O.B. 3007, Herzlia 46104, Israel Tel. +972 52 522261
amos%taux01 at nsc.com 34 48 E / 32 10 N
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list