Re^2: Should ``csh'' be part of the System V distribution?
Ron Natalie
ron at topaz.rutgers.edu
Sat May 21 04:46:29 AEST 1988
> Bourne Shell (System V Version):
> - No easy alias mechanism (functions are inadequate)
Why, seem to wholly sufficient for me.
> - Offers only a one-time start-up script (.profile (/etc/profile))
Does have .logout compatibility, but it is hidden in the "trap" command.
>C Shell:
> + Superior interactive automatic scripts (.cshrc, .login & .logout)
But no system wide .login like /etc/profile.
Of course there are some shells, tcsh and the like you've left out.
However, there is the BRL Bourne Shell, which is the System V R2
shell modified by Doug Gwyn and myself which features:
Full VR2 /bin/sh features (shell functions, etc...)
~user expansions.
Emacs-like command editing (keys are reprogrammable)
Additional startup file (like .cshrc).
Anti-control-D mode (forces you to use logout or exit).
Job Control if you're system supports it.
Optional timeout of idle sessions.
Optional forces superuser prompts to have (#) in them.
-Ron
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list