X sucks (was: Re: Ware Ware Wizardjin)
Frank P. Bresz
fpb at ittc.wec.com
Fri Apr 12 22:35:27 AEST 1991
In article <1991Apr10.194243.12882 at watmath.waterloo.edu> gamiddle at watmath.waterloo.edu (Guy Middleton) writes:
>X does suck, but its popularity seems inevitable, since it doesn't cost any
>money. Other, better systems could have become the de facto standard, had
>they been as cheap. Of the set of free, reasonably portable, reasonably
>hardware-independent window systems that have been available since
>workstation hardware became affordable, X seems to be the best. Of course,
>that set has only one member.
Well I for one must disagree with the X sucks. I personally like
X. I am much happier than I was with sunview. I use GNU-Emacs in X mode
and I run Xterm all of the time. I am primarily a text man so I can't
speek to well for the graphics.
I think the fact about the only set of free software is true. This
is the reason I run it. I can't see shelling out good $$$ for something
like MOTIF when I get much faster response from the stuff from MIT.
I won't even discuss OpenWindows from Sun sans to say it is slow
and uncustomizable aside from that I don't know why I don't like it.
Lord John Whorfin
--
| () () () | Frank P. Bresz | Westinghouse Electric Corporation
| \ /\ / | fpb at ittc.wec.com | ITTC Simulators Department
| \/ \/ | uunet!ittc!fpb | Those who can, do. Those who can't, simulate.
| ---------- | +1 412 733 6749 | My opinions are mine, WEC don't want 'em.
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list