Unix-PC crashing during uucico
John McMillan
jcm at mtune.ATT.COM
Fri Feb 2 08:15:46 AEST 1990
In article <1990Jan31.170216.27161 at eci386.uucp> clewis at eci386.UUCP (Chris Lewis) writes:
:
>Well thanks a whole hell of a lot:
Your attitude is contageous.
> 1) This isn't RS232, this is OBM - different driver. The only
> thing I have on RS232 is a 300 baud diablo printer and the 3b1
> has *never* crashed during printing.
Reconsider. Only the phone-line polling and call setup
software differ. Your OBM is fed from the On Board RS232
[sans line-drivers]! Their shared hardware was so
intertwined it took years to find some insidious the
bugs resulting from the sharing.
[Sorry, much as we'd like, we can't take credit for writing
the original drivers: we were too busy planning to screw up
your phone network calls -- ref: below.]
> 2) I've been asking this question every other month for quite a bit
> longer than you've been posting to this newsgroup, and have *never*
> gotten any response other than vague references to the power supply.
> (It can't be the powersupply, because the machine has been completely
> replaced and is still exhibiting the same problem at the same
> frequency, *AND* none of our other 6 machines have ever panicked
> in this fashion - some of which UUCP more per day than ecicrl
> does. They're all the same version of the O/S. So, it must be
> something environmental).
Well... this shatters me. While I've worked hard at answering
questions though lacking adequate data, I've a ways to go.
'Seems to me this is the 1st time I've caught references to
your DUART activity. [OK, I admit it: I stopped curling up
with your notes at night, and I don't recall them all.]
:
> 5) It's worthy of note that people are *still* suggesting power supply
> problems - in particular, people as knowledgable as John Milton...
> So it ain't all that well known.
As I stated: the problem is well understood and well documented.
In the "brief" time -- compared to your contributions --
that I've been posting to this group, I've described the
problem several times. I've also described it in technical
conversations and memos within AT&T.
If you present "crashes during DUART activites" to a sober,
knowledgable 3B1-support person, they should recognize the
strong possibility of illegally interleaved command sequences
to a DUART chip.
I'm *NOT* saying your problem *IS* the DUART problem: just
that these are the symptoms of it. I would ALSO consider
power-supply problems and noise problems -- I would NOT be
running this machine without Ruby(tm) [or analogous] line-
conditioners. I would NOT be running this with an ancient
kernel that has not benefitted from at least the 3.51 fixes.
> 6) It's worthy of note that several very knowledgable people in AT&T
> have been consulted (outside of normal support channels) and *no*
> concrete suggestions or suspicions have ever been expressed.
I'm hardly privy to the details you presented them, but
I'll take your word they were ultra-knowledgable. It's
entirely possible that the Tier-II & Tier-IV staff I've
explained the problem to have deliberately kept this matter
a secret. [After all, THEY don't get a chance to nobble
the phone network as often as they'd LIKE! So... they
take it out in other directions.]
> 7) You might want to ask Lenny what happened to our 3.51 upgrade...
> (Though it's not his fault...)
OK -- 'Fess up, Lenny. We know you've got it and we're
showing up tonight to take it or you're gonna regret it!
Actually, in -- am I right Lenny? -- hundreds [seems like
thousands] of communications with Lenny, he's failed to
mention your upgrade. [You sly bugger, Lenny.]
>American Telephone and Telegraph: one might make similar suggestions regarding
>your company's inability to keep the long distance telephone network running...
Cute. Trite, simplistic, and irrelevant... but cute!
>Chris Lewis, Elegant Communications Inc, {uunet!attcan,utzoo}!lsuc!eci386!clewis
>Ferret mailing list: eci386!ferret-list, psroff mailing list: eci386!psroff-list
john mcmillan -- att!mtune!jcm
More information about the Unix-pc.general
mailing list