4D4X0 ??

[Jeremy Higdon]

In article <101106 at sgi.sgi.com>, jeremy at perf2.asd.sgi.com (Jeremy Higdon) writes:
> In article <1991May2.012911.10176 at odin.corp.sgi.com>, jmb at patton.wpd.sgi.com (Jim Barton) writes:
> > In article <100399 at sgi.sgi.com>, jeremy at perf2.asd.sgi.com (Jeremy Higdon) writes:
> > |> From: jeremy at perf2.asd.sgi.com (Jeremy Higdon)
> > |> Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi
> > |> Subject: Re: 4D4X0 ??
> > |> Message-ID: <100399 at sgi.sgi.com>
> > |> Date: 30 Apr 91 04:26:16 GMT
> > |> Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mountain View, CA
> > |> 
> > |> In article <3985 at uc.msc.umn.edu>, ken at uh.msc.umn.edu (Ken Chin-Purcell) writes:
> > |> > Jeremy Higdon writes:
> > |> > 
> > |> > > The 4D/400 family are 40 mhz R3000 machines.
> > |> > 
> > |> > Has either bus (Iris or VME) gotten faster?  We're hungry for
> > |> > throughput....
> > |> > 
> > |> 
> > |> The VME and MP buses run at the same speed, 
> 
> 					       ^ on the 4D/400 and the
> 					         4D/300 machines.
> 
						^ which is not to say that
						  the VME and MP buses run
						  at the same speed, but that
						  the MP bus on the 4D/400
						  runs at the same speed as
						  the MP bus on the 4D/300,
						  etc.